"Meanwhile back at the morgue..."
The first chapter introduces two cases: Arthur Brown and Bert Kling interview a young black woman working as a maid who's been conned out of five dollars by a pretend preacher, and Steve Carella is called in where a dead body of a woman is found floating by the docks.
Brown is determined to find the con man; Carella first has to determine if what he's looking at is a crime, but it is. His floater didn't drown, but went into the water already dead from arsenic poisoning. ("Back at the morgue...")
Then a second woman is found floating in the harbor, also dead from arsenic poisoning. Both women have tattoos on their hand.
This is the fourth of McBain's series of 87th Precinct novels. I enjoyed it, but I don't think it was a particularly strong entry in the series. McBain can occasionally be didactic about police methods--he does famously precede his novels with:
"The city in these pages is imaginary.The people, the places are all fictitious.Only the police routine is based on established investigatory technique."
In this one, we learned how fingerprints are taken from dead bodies, which was grisly, and maybe interesting? At least relevant to the plot. But there was too much about how con men do their thing, which didn't have much to do with our particular con men. But the final chase was certainly thrilling enough...
Vintage Mystery Scavenger Hunt
Golden Age (1957). Policeman.
I suppose that's Steve Carella on the cover in plainclothes, and Fred di Angelo, the beat cop to whom the body was first reported behind him.

Oh, I read a whole BUNCH of McBain back in the day. I know what you mean about the procedure part! Mostly good fun though - and short/quick! I think it only took a day or so to read them.
ReplyDeleteEven less good ones are a fun, easy read. I haven't read all of them, but I do think they got better when he quit feeling the need to write three of them a year, though...
DeleteI managed 30 out of the (around) 56 87th Precinct books... So not too bad!
DeleteYou've managed more than me, though I've got a couple of unread ones on the shelf that could happen soonish.
DeleteI've heard this author's name many times but have never read any of his mysteries. Maybe because police procedurals are not my favorite kinds of mystery to read.
ReplyDeleteHe's pretty good, and I also don't read many police procedurals, but I do like him.
Delete