"All talk would be nonsense, I suppose, if it were written down," she said, stirring her coffee.Maggie stopped the machine for a moment and smiled."And even if it isn't," she said."But it's the only way we have of knowing each other," Rose protested.
The Years was the last novel completed by Virginia Woolf during her life, and came out in 1937. It was the biggest financial success of her lifetime, though I have to imagine Mrs. Dalloway has sold more copies now. It's the story of the Pargiter family across three generations. Colonel Abel Pargiter, who served in India, and his wife Rose, are the parents of seven children; they form the core of the novel, though there are also cousins and family friends.
The novel is arranged in ten chapters, each labelled with a year. The longest are the first, 1880, and the last, 'The Present Day,' presumably 1936 or so, just before the novel appears. In 1880, we meet the seven children--Eleanor, Morris, Milly, Edward, Delia, Martin, and Rose. Mother Rose has been bedridden for years, and may finally be dying, and we see the children's (and husband's--who keeps a mistress) reaction to their mother's imminent death. Delia, the rebellious one, thinks it's time for her to go; others are more uncertain, but it's true Rose the mother doesn't have much of a life by then. At the end of the chapter, after a couple of dream-haunted days of collapses and rallies, she dies.
The other year chapters all take place on a single day, and are built around a meeting of family members. In 1891, it's the day of Parnell's death, the advocate for Irish Home Rule; Colonel Abel goes to visit his brother and sister-in-law for his niece Maggie's birthday. Abel, perfectly content in his imperialism, had no use for Parnell, but admires his sister-in-law's emotion at the death. In 1917 Maggie, now married to a Frenchman René (Renny), hosts Eleanor for dinner; German air raids on London occur that night. 1918 sees the day of the armistice; we follow Crosby, the Pargiter nurse and maid, now pensioned off, in the shortest chapter; she's annoyed by all the celebratory guns going off. In 'The Present Day', Delia and her husband Patrick, throw a party; all the surviving family members appear; there's a dance and dinner, and the party ends at dawn:
"The sun had risen, and the sky above the houses wore an air of extraordinary beauty, simplicity and peace."
So it's a family novel, but if so, it's quite different from what you might expect; it's impressionistic in its style, sketch-y, even, so long as you don't imagine that as a derogatory adjective. It's half the length of Buddenbrooks, for example, and avoids scenes that might have been expected: Charles, one of Maggie's children, dies in World War I, but we only learn that obliquely and long after the event.
Woolf conceived the novel after she'd given a lecture 'Professions for Women' in 1931:
"When your secretary invited me to come here, she told me that your Society is concerned with the employment of women and she suggested that I might tell you something about my own professional experiences. It is true I am a woman; it is true I am employed; but what professional experiences have I had? It is difficult to say."
That set her to thinking and she initially imagined a novel-essay about the Pargiter family, a blend of essays about the status of women mixed with fictional episodes. That book was reconstructed after her death and is available, titled The Pargiters, but I haven't read it. In the end, though, the essays became her book Three Guineas and the fictional episodes became the novel The Years. That initial conception is still visible; in the first generation, there aren't many possibilities for women: Eleanor ends up looking after her widowed father, only becoming a great world traveler after his death; Kitty, a cousin, whom Edward Pargiter loved and wanted to marry, marries instead a great lord and lives that lifestyle; Delia, in that first generation but somewhat younger, becomes a suffragette and is sent to prison for her agitation. It's only in the third generation that real professional possibilities open up for women: Peggy, Maggie's daughter, becomes a doctor, though it doesn't seem to make her very happy.
But a schematic essay-novel is not the novel Virginia Woolf has given us (though the idea of it definitely colors the criticism from what I've seen). Several of the male characters are also well-rounded, particularly Abel, the patriarch, and North, Peggy and Charles' brother, who also served in World War I, but then went to be a farmer in Africa. Like any family novel of multiple generations, it's interested in the passing of time, and 1880 to 1935 are a time of great changes in England. In 1880, tea is being made with a spirit lamp and people travel in horse-drawn carriages; in 1936, the flash and circle symbol of the British Union of Fascists is graffitied on walls, and Eleanor discusses traveling by plane (though she doesn't).
It's also very good on family relations. As aunt and niece suggest in that opening quote, there's never perfect understanding or communication. During that final party, Edward, by then a professor, quotes Sophocles, but refuses to translate:
"It's no go, North thought. He can't say what he wants to say; he's afraid. They're all afraid; afraid of being laughed at; afraid of giving themselves away. He's afraid too, he thought, looking at the young man with a fine forehead and a weak chin, who was gesticulating too emphatically. We're all afraid of each other, he thought; afraid of what?"
And yet that's not the whole of the story either; again as that opening quote suggests, there is communication. North dances with a girl at the party, asks her for a date, she accepts. The next generation? Another way in which this would be unlike Buddenbrooks. This is a family with a decent amount of good will toward each other--not true of all families-- even if they don't always articulate it. The party is a success; it, and the novel, end with 'simplicity and peace.'
οὔτοι συνέχθειν, άλλα συνφιλεῖν ἔφυν
-Sophocles, Antigone, l.523 (Antigone speaking)
And what was it Edward was unable to say in English? Elizabeth Wyckoff translates as, "I cannot share in hatred, but in love."
Nothing of Virginia Woolf's is exactly unknown or ignored. As I noted, you can easily enough find the novel The Pargiters she decided against giving us. But when I first was reading Virginia Woolf, thirty years ago or whatever, I read Mrs. Dalloway, To The Lighthouse, Orlando, the Common Reader series, etc., but it didn't occur to me to read The Years. I don't know what bit of received opinion I picked up that I didn't need to read it, but it was wrong.
This was my spin book for Classics Club Spin #44, and a very good spin it was!

I liked this one. Though it's been so long since I read it, I don't actually remember that much about it. Reading your review makes me want to dig out my copy and read it again. :D
ReplyDeleteI expected to like it, but I was a bit surprised how much I liked it. I could be curious what you thought if you did reread it.
DeleteI am fascinated that this novel, her last and most successful during her lifetime, was published five years before her death. Did she stop writing after this one or was not able to write due to her worsening mental health.
ReplyDeleteI read Madame Bovary https://headfullofbooks.blogspot.com/2026/06/classic-review-madame-bovary.html
She had one more novel in her, Between the Acts, which, according to Leonard, was substantially complete at her death. I recently read it & hope to blog about it soon. I thought it was good, though I did think this was better.
DeleteI haven't ever read Virginia Woolf. I do like the sound of this one!
ReplyDeleteThis might be a good one to start with--easier than something like To The Lighthouse, but still awfully good I thought.
DeleteI really should kick-start my Woolf reading project again. Every time I read reviews like this I just now I will love these stories too. I keep putting them on my CC spin list, but only one has ever come up in 44 spins!
ReplyDeleteThe spin has done a bit better by Virginia Woolf for me--this is the second of her books that have come up on a spin.
DeleteNevertheless I'm still a bit determined to go on a Virginia Woolf bender--even the ones I thought I could ignore turn out to be pretty great. I've already read Between the Acts & should post on it soon.
I'm so glad you enjoyed this one as much as I did; I didn't read "around" the book as much as you, but I knew it wasn't considered one of "the important ones" and maybe that's why I fell off there in my plan to read through her stuff. (It landed in the stack again for one of the Club reads.) In any case, I think it might actually be my favourite. Though I'm encouraged that you also enjoyed Between the Acts, my last to read, I think.
ReplyDelete-Marcie
I don't really understand why it's not considered one of the important ones--I think it is. And quite enjoyable as well.
DeleteMaybe because it's an easier read than To The Lighthouse it's considered less significant? I don't know.
It was on my list of 1937 candidates, but I ended up not reading anything for that edition of the club because we were out of town.