Thursday, April 24, 2025

Kurt Vonnegut's Player Piano (#1952Club)

"He knew with all his heart the human situation was a frightful botch, but it was such a logical, intelligently arrived-at botch, that he couldn't see how history could have possibly led anywhere else."

Doctor Paul Proteus is the manager of the Ilium Works, "the most important, brilliant person in Ilium." He's only thirty-five, and he's expected to only move up from that triumph. After all his father was Doctor George Proteus, a man second in importance only to the president of the United States.

The time is after the third world war; industrial planning and robotics were so important and successful in enabling the U.S. to win those wars, that now everything is given over to managers and engineers--and the machines that replace most people's jobs. 

It's a meritocratic society--examinations determine each individual's capabilities--and your punch card determines the sort of job you can have. If you're not qualified for any of the jobs, you're not tossed aside--exactly. You're offered a position in the Army--though there are no more wars after that last one--or the Reconstruction and Reclamation Corps, the 'Reeks and Wrecks'. It'll keep you from starving. But everybody knows both are just make-work.

The quote above is Proteus thinking about the current state of the U.S. Something's not right.

There's a rebel organization, the Ghost Shirt Society, that aims to do something about it. From their manifesto:

"Men, by their nature, seemingly, cannot be happy unless engaged in enterprises that make them feel useful. They must, therefore, be returned to participation is such enterprises."

Proteus is drawn to the ideas of the Ghost Shirt Society, but he's also an engineer and finds it hard to approve inefficiency for its own sake. But then his superiors want him to infiltrate the Society, and publicly fire him to ease his infiltration. What does he decide to do?

Player Piano is Vonnegut's first novel and it's definitely 1952. Processes that improve to such a degree there won't be enough work for all the workers is probably more a risk now than in 1952, but in the novel it happens with punch cards and tape, and the majority of the jobs replaced are assembly line-style work. (No LLMs or general AI.) There are a few women that work, but mostly their opportunities are limited to marriage. (Vonnegut is sympathetic to women not having anything to do, but he doesn't really see around the problem in this; their usefulness is ruined by automatic washers.) But the novel does examine real issues with a human setting, and is unpredictable in its outcome.

Still, while it's not the equal of Vonnegut's later greater novels--the prose is flatter, the construction isn't as tight, it doesn't have those flights of inspired absurdism--it is pretty solid, and better than I expected it to be. (It's usually dismissed.) It does have the Shah of Bratpuhr, the 'spiritual leader of 6,000,000 members of the Kolhouri sect,'  an amusingly ridiculous character who could show up in Cat's Cradle. There's humor:

"I think I can say without fear of contradiction that I earned that degree. My thesis was the third longest in any field in the country that year."

A different character has all his academic degrees revoked because it's discovered he never passed gym. (Noooooo!)

A contribution to the 1952 Club. Thanks to Kaggsy and Simon for hosting!

 WordPress has been sending my comments to the spam folder again, it seems.


10 comments:

  1. When my now-husband and I were dating, fifty years ago, he revealed that he was a Kurt Vonnegut fan. I dutifully read his collection. A long time ago. I should see what I think now.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I do think the next three novels after this one are awfully good--and I'm not particularly a sci-fi fan. Some of the ones in the 70s I thought were a bit slack.

      This wasn't quite one of his greats, but it was closer than I thought it was going to be.

      Delete
  2. How fascinating! Not a Vonnegut I've heard of!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's not usually, and now I think it should be.

      Delete
  3. Nice review! I am glad you insisted more on the period, whereas I saw it more like a prophecy of where we are at now.
    I definitely want to read more by him

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It could be our future, too! Alas... Though nowadays they wouldn't even have Reeks and Wrecks--people would just get tossed aside.

      Delete
  4. How interesting! I've never read this one (and only two of his books) but, as Emma mentions above, I'm struck by the relevance to today's workplaces and how people's value is assessed (and dismissed).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. With all the talk of general AI replacing jobs, the book feels newly relevant, even if its industrial processes mark it of its time.

      Delete
  5. I've read one book by Vonnegut, and I didn't love it...maybe because I didn't quite understand it? I would like to try him again someday.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I find a few of his to be pretty great, Cat's Cradle or Slaughterhouse-Five. They can be strange and absurd.

      Delete